Sell the unlock,
earn the trust.
A working method for selling six and seven figure judgement into regulated, multi-stakeholder, risk-allergic industries. Built from three of our own conversations, and from the best thinking in complex selling and persuasion. Designed to be coached from, not just read.
How to use this
This is a bench you return to before a senior conversation, a mirror you hold up after one, and a syllabus a sales lead can coach from. Three jobs, one document.
Before a call, skim the method (Section 02) and the relevant scripts. After a call, score yourself on the card (Section 16). The frameworks are tools; pick the one the moment needs.
Use the coached calls (Section 13) and the role-play scenarios (Section 14) as session material. Section 15 is a ready-to-run 60 minute coaching session.
The one-liner and pitch (Section 09) should be said the same way by everyone. Consistency is a strength buyers can feel. Memorise the field card (Section 17).
None of the three is a closing call, and that is the point. Two are gatekeeper and referral conversations with Industry Capability Network managers whose job is to make introductions. One is a channel strategy session with an ElectraNet insider we would pay on commission. These are the top of our funnel, and they are exactly where most high-stakes deals are won or lost. The coaching grades them on what they were for, not on whether anyone signed.
These came from Otter.ai. Speaker labels are not always reliable (the tool swaps Jason and GP in places and garbles the odd word), so where a quote could belong to either of you, the coaching targets the behaviour, not the person. Sanity check the attributions against your memory of the room.
We win on two things: clarity and trust
A confused buyer says no.
The product is genuinely good. The two places a deal like ours is actually decided are earlier and simpler than the product: can they understand it, and do they believe us.
Across three smart, warm conversations, the same two signals kept surfacing. First, clarity. When we explain what we do, the listener cannot always picture it or their part in it. Second, trust. Before anyone engages, they quietly check whether we are real. Here is the market telling us, in its own words, with nothing held against us:
"I tried to do computer research on you guys... I was a little confused when I was trying to figure it out."Clarity
"It's always a conundrum and a problem we're struggling with."Clarity, named honestly
"Certainly a different way of going about it. I like it."Trust: then immediately checked how long we had existed
This is not a charisma problem or a talent problem. The team is good in the room. It is a packaging problem, and packaging is the most fixable thing in selling. The rest of this guide does two jobs: it gives you a method to make the value obvious and the credibility immediate, and it protects the thing you already do better than almost anyone, which is turning a warm network into a pipeline.
If we fix only the first ninety seconds of every conversation, lead with proof and one vivid example before any abstraction, every other number moves. Clarity and trust are upstream of everything else.
The official Sales Playbook says it plainly: agreement on the diagnosis is the sales event, not the proposal. By the time a proposal lands, the buyer already accepts the problem, the budget and the sponsor. This whole guide serves that one idea: make the problem clear and shared, and the proposal becomes a formality. Clarity is not a nicety here, it is the entire mechanism.
The 11.2 Sales Method
No single framework fits a long, multi-stakeholder, trust-gated sale. So we borrow the best layer from each of the proven ones and stack them. Think of it as a map, a set of questions, a teach, a meeting shape, and a persuasion layer running through all of it.
You do not run six frameworks at once. MEDDIC is the map you keep in your head across the whole deal. In any given meeting you Clarify and run SPIN questions, you Teach a reframe, and Cialdini is simply how you carry yourself throughout. The offer and pitch tools are for the moments you are presenting. If you remember one sentence: ask more than you tell, teach before you pitch, and prove before they ask.
The deal, across 3 to 6 months
Before zooming into one call, here is the whole campaign. Our sale is not a meeting, it is a 3 to 6 month, multi-stakeholder cycle that mirrors the company's nine-stage Sales Playbook and is fed by the Go-to-Market front door. The frameworks still apply, they just spread across stages, and the cast widens as you go. The golden rule: the diagnosis is the sales event, the proposal only formalises it.
~Mo 0
~Mo 0-2
~Mo 1-3
~Mo 3-5
~Mo 2-6+
Stages overlap in practice, and the clock is 3 to 6 months end to end. The golden rule from the company Sales Playbook: the diagnosis is the sales event, the proposal only formalises a decision already made. Two habits keep it moving: widen the threads (a deal that lives only with your champion is a deal at risk), and reinforce after every call with a recap and a dated next step.
| Stage | What it is for | Advance when |
|---|---|---|
| Front door · Build Review | Give real value first: a 45-minute read on one stuck idea. Convert attention into a qualified conversation and arm a champion. | They engage a problem-shaped idea and book or accept the read. |
| Diagnose & reframe | Deep SPIN diagnosis, teach the reframe, show Dottie and Spark, widen to three or more stakeholders. The diagnosis is the sales event. | The buyer adopts the reframe and agrees the gap is real, and the economic buyer has seen it. |
| Define & prescribe | Size the gap, name the budget, and let the prescription emerge as Discover. | A specific problem statement and a named budget, with Discover scoped. |
| Business case & proposal | Build internal consensus and a sponsor; the proposal formalises an already-accepted decision. | A sponsor owns it, the decision path is clear, and the proposal does not re-argue the diagnosis. |
| Deliver & expand | Discover to Thrive to E! Centre. Solve bigger capability problems, not bigger projects. | Value delivered, trust earned, and the next scope identified. |
Zoom in: a single call
Now zoom into one early call. The same frameworks sequence again, minute to minute, left to right. Two bars never switch off here: the persuasion layer and the underlying arc. Everything else has a season.
proof + hook
Time runs left to right. The value ladder bar runs off the right edge on purpose: the demo and the pilot ask happen in this call, but the pilot delivery and the expansion play out across later meetings, not at the end of this conversation. The two bars below the dashed line never switch off: you are always persuading, and always inside the arc.
MEDDIC: navigate the deal, not just the call
The gold standard for complex B2B, built for exactly our shape: high value, many stakeholders, long cycles. It is not a script, it is a checklist of what you must know to keep a deal moving. The full version, MEDDPICC, adds Paper process and Competition for when procurement and rivals enter.
| Element | What it means, in our world |
|---|---|
| M · Metrics | The number the unlock is worth to them. Turn a $40m line-removal cost into an avoided cost or a revenue line. No metric, no business case. |
| E · Economic buyer | The person who can actually say yes and free the budget. On the DMIS play, the GM holding the $2m. Get to them, or arm a champion who can. |
| D · Decision criteria | What they will judge us on: do-no-harm to the base business, speed, credibility, unregulated upside. Know it, then meet it explicitly. |
| D · Decision process | The steps from interest to signature: who reviews, what approvals, what board cycle. Chris mapped this for us with the executive politics. That is decision-process intel. |
| I · Identify pain | The accepted cost or stalled item that hurts. "Free money we keep handing back" is pain. Surface it with SPIN. |
| C · Champion | Someone inside who sells for you when you are not in the room. Chris is a paid champion; the ICN managers are network champions. Equip them. |
A single-call closing framework assumes one buyer and one conversation. Our deals have neither. MEDDIC gives the team a shared language for "what do we still not know about this deal" so a promising conversation does not quietly die because nobody identified the economic buyer or armed a champion. After every meeting, fill the gaps: which letters do we now know, which are still blank.
Who is a fit, and who is not
The fastest way to lift our win rate is to spend less time on the wrong conversations. MEDDIC is qualification, so here is the front-door version: who to chase, and who to thank warmly and move on from.
Strong fit, lean in
- Owners or operators of major energy and infrastructure assets ($100m and up) where a second use is physically possible.
- Assets at a decision point: a new build being scoped, a project struggling to clear its metrics, or one facing decommissioning or abandonment.
- A stalled, free-money item nobody owns (the DMIS pattern), or a precinct with multiple players who are not talking to each other.
- Private companies especially, who want to see a tangible demo, with a reachable economic buyer (a GM or asset owner, not only a procurement contact).
- A real clock: a regulatory decision, a funding window, a trench about to be dug.
Poor fit, qualify out
- Buyers who want a report with no intent to act. We are not a feasibility-study vendor.
- Organisations with zero appetite outside the core and no unregulated upside to chase. If "we only do poles and wires" is final, walk.
- No reachable economic buyer, or a pure gatekeeper with no line to one.
- Assets too small for the prize to justify the work. The prize has to dwarf the pilot.
- Anyone shopping for free consulting with no path to a paid engagement.
"Is there an asset big enough that a second use would be material?" "Is there someone who can actually free a budget, and can we reach them?" "Is there a reason this matters now rather than next year?" If all three are yes, lean in. If two or more are no, stay warm and keep them in the network, but do not invest the time yet.
The three hard gates
From the company Sales Playbook: the gates that protect the proposal. Each can send a deal back to nurture, cheaply, before it wastes a quarter.
- No accepted diagnosis, no advance. If the buyer will not adopt the reframe, recycle to nurture. Never sell into a rejected problem.
- No named budget, no proposal. A problem with no pocket to pay for it is brand, not pipeline.
- No sponsor, no proposal. A proposal into a single-threaded account is a quote, and quotes lose.
Recycling is not failure. It is the cheapest outcome for a deal that was never going to close, and it keeps the account warm for the next window.
SPIN: the discovery engine
Across all three calls, the pattern was the same: we explained more than we asked, and the buyer ended up supplying our best examples. SPIN flips that. The research behind it found that top performers in big-ticket sales ask roughly four times more Implication questions than average performers. They do not pitch harder; they ask better.
Understand their world
Light touch, just enough to orient. "Walk me through how this asset is set up today." Do not over-do these; you should know most of it from research.
Find the dissatisfaction
"Where is value leaking that everyone has accepted as the cost of doing business?" Surface the thing they have stopped questioning.
Make the problem hurt
"Over a 40 year regulatory horizon, what does maintaining those dead lines actually total?" This is where a cost becomes a felt problem. Spend most of your questions here.
Let them say the value
"If that steel paid for itself instead, what would that change for you?" The buyer voices the benefit, so it is theirs, not your claim.
For every minute you explain, earn it with two minutes of them explaining. When you catch yourself three sentences into an abstraction, stop and ask an Implication question instead. The person asking the best questions runs the room, not the one talking the most. The full question bank is in Section 10.
Challenger: teach the reframe that only we can
The research on complex B2B found that the top performers are not the best relationship builders, they are the ones who teach the customer something they did not see, tailor it to each stakeholder, and take control of the conversation. For us this is not a tactic bolted on; the reframe is the product.
"You optimise every project for one job and accept everything else it could do as sunk cost. That single habit is leaving money, risk reduction, and community goodwill on the table on every asset you own."
That is a Challenger reframe: it changes how they see their own world before we ever mention what we do. The discipline is to lead with the insight, not the company. Here is the proven teaching choreography, mapped to our material:
- Warmer. Show you understand their world. "Most asset owners we meet are heads-down optimising the build in front of them, and rightly so." Earns the right to challenge.
- Reframe. Introduce the surprising idea. "The expensive part is not the build. It is everything the build could have done and did not."
- Rational drowning. Make the cost of the status quo concrete. Use their numbers: the $40m removal, the dead-line maintenance over 40 years, the $2m handed back.
- Emotional impact. Make it personal to the stakeholder. "You will be the one explaining to the board why the asset only ever did one job."
- A new way. Show the better path, still without selling yourself. "There is a way to make a build pay for itself more than once, decided before the trench is dug."
- Your solution. Only now position 11.2 as the natural way to do the new way. By this point you are the obvious answer, not a pitch.
Tailor the same insight per stakeholder: the GM hears revenue and reputation, the engineer hears no disruption to the base business, the regulator-facing person hears compliance and community benefit. Take control by always leaving with the next step defined, never "let us stay in touch."
CLOSER: the shape of a single conversation
CLOSER is a clean arc for one conversation. In a transactional sale you run it in a single call. In ours, the arc stretches across the whole campaign: you might Clarify and Label in the first meeting and not Sell the outcome until the third. Use it as the shape of each meeting, and as a map of where the relationship sits overall.
| Step | In one meeting | Across the campaign |
|---|---|---|
| Clarify | "What made you take this call? What did you hear?" | Early meetings. Understand why this is on their radar at all. |
| Label | Say their problem back so they feel understood. | Builds the trust that lets later meetings go deeper. |
| Overview | "What have you already tried, and what happened?" | Surfaces the history of stalled attempts (the DMIS scheme is a classic). |
| Sell the outcome | Present the unlocked value in their numbers, not the mechanism. | Middle of the campaign, once trust and pain are established. |
| Explain concerns | Handle risk, busyness, "we already do that" (Section 11). | Recurs at every stage; risk is never handled once. |
| Reinforce | Lock the dated, owned next step before anyone hangs up. | After every yes, reinforce the decision to kill second-guessing and keep momentum. The single biggest lever on sales velocity, expanded below. |
Reinforce: the discipline that protects sales velocity
Reinforce is the most neglected step in a long sale and the one with the most commercial leverage. In a transactional deal it is a thank-you after payment. In ours it is the engine that keeps a multi-month, multi-stakeholder deal moving, and it is the single biggest thing we control that drives velocity.
Deals do not die in meetings. They die in the gaps between them. Every day a deal sits without a defined, owned next step it cools: the champion forgets the detail, a new priority lands, the regulatory window drifts, the economic buyer never gets briefed. A deal with no reinforced next step does not stall politely, it quietly evaporates. Reinforce removes the gaps, and removing the gaps is how you compress a sales cycle without ever pushing the buyer. It is the cheapest velocity we will ever buy.
It works on two layers, and the team should run both, every time:
Reinforce the commitment
At the end of every meeting, before anyone hangs up. Never close on "let us stay in touch." Lock a dated, owned, mutual next step: who does what, by when. This is an upfront contract for the next conversation, and it is the difference between a pipeline and a list of pleasant chats.
Reinforce the decision
After every yes, even a small one like agreeing to a pilot or a follow-up meeting. In a multi-stakeholder buy your champion has to defend that decision to people who were not in the room. Reinforce makes them feel smart, hands them the words, and stops momentum leaking before the next step.
The Reinforce playbook
- The dated mutual next step, before you hang up. "So the next step is X. I will do A by Tuesday, you will do B, and we meet Thursday to review. Does that work?" Two named time options beat an open "sometime."
- The same-day recap message. Send within hours, while it is warm. Five lines: what we agreed, why it matters, the next step, who owns it, the date. This is the artefact your champion forwards internally on your behalf.
- The mutual action plan for live deals. A shared, simple list of the steps to a decision, with dates and owners on both sides. It makes the path visible, holds both parties accountable, and is the single best tool for keeping a complex deal moving.
- Momentum between meetings. Deliver the promised thing fast, give a reason to engage before the next touch, keep the champion warm. Speed of follow-through is itself a credibility signal. Authority
- Reinforce after the yes. Confirm they made a smart call, give them something to be excited about, and give them something forwardable, so the decision spreads inside their organisation rather than stalling with one person. Commitment
Same warmth, but it converts goodwill into motion. The endings on all three calls drifted toward "stay in touch." This is the one habit that turns a friendly conversation into a moving deal.
No meeting ends without a dated, owned next step. No yes goes without a same-day recap. Both are on the scorecard (Section 16) and both get checked in every coaching session (Section 15). It is unglamorous, it is entirely within our control, and it is worth more to velocity than any clever line.
Cialdini: the seven principles, pointed at our deals
In a sale decided by trust, the science of influence matters more than the art of the offer. Cialdini's seven principles are not tricks; used straight, they are simply how you make it easy and safe for a careful buyer to say yes. Each one maps onto a moment that already happened in our calls.
| Principle | How we use it, honestly | From the calls |
|---|---|---|
| Authority | Pay the credibility toll early: embedded in Santos, operating since 2018, ventures launched. Lead with it, do not wait to be asked. | Brad's first instinct was to check how long we had existed. Authority answers that before it is voiced. |
| Social proof | Name champions: ICN managers across three states, peer operators. Our buyers "rely on peer recommendations", so this is the channel, not a nicety. | Naming Lisa, Bettina and Dasco gave Brad reasons to trust by association. |
| Reciprocity | Give first: intel, an introduction back, the regulatory link, a closed loop on a prior intro. The obligation to reciprocate is real and earned. | Thanking Tim and reporting back on his intros is textbook, and it is why he kept giving. |
| Liking | Genuine rapport and similarity. We have operated their assets; we are one of them, not vendors. Warmth is a feature, not a detour. | The shared-background, same-haircut, football banter built real liking. Keep it, just do not let it crowd out the next step. |
| Scarcity | Use the real clock only: a regulatory decision due in June, $2m of use-it-or-lose-it funds, a trench that closes. Never invent urgency. | The DMIS funds genuinely expire. Naming that is honest scarcity that creates real urgency. |
| Commitment and consistency | Start with a small yes. A paid pilot is a commitment that makes the larger engagement consistent with a decision they already made. | The "small engagement that demonstrates capability" instinct is exactly this principle. |
| Unity | "A firm that has actually run these assets." Shared identity beats persuasion. We are inside their tribe, not pitching from outside it. | "I lived that" and the Santos embed signal we are one of them, which lowers the wall. |
Every one of these works because it is true. We have real authority, real proof, real reciprocity, real scarcity. The moment any of them is manufactured, a sophisticated buyer smells it and trust drops faster than any single yes was worth. Use them straight.
The front door and the offer ladder
This is where the bible meets the company's real offer. We do not lead with a pitch, we lead with value: a free, genuine piece of work that proves we understand the problem well enough to build the answer. The paid work follows. The diagnosis, not the proposal, is the sale.
This section aligns to the official Sales Playbook (the nine-stage, diagnosis-led pipeline) and the Go-to-Market engine (the front door and the funnel). The frameworks in this guide are how you execute those stages well in the room. The ladder below is the company's real ladder, not an invention.
The front door: give value before you invoice GTM
The way in is the Build Review: a 45-minute working session, free, for a COO or head of strategy carrying an idea they cannot get off the ground. They leave with a one-page build read, the verdict, the first move, the biggest risk, and what it would take, theirs to keep whether or not we are a fit. A working session, not a sales call in disguise. Three on-ramps, lightest first:
- The self-serve read. A ten-question exposure scorecard. Instant, no email. Where are they exposed across AI, the energy transition and geopolitics.
- The written read. They send the score, or the stuck idea. We send back a one-page read. No call needed.
- The Build Review. The 45-minute live session, for when they want to go deeper. The Dottie and Spark demo lives here.
Why give it away: we already spend real hours on calls with people who never sign. Productising that into a named, repeatable, free deliverable turns value we leak into the thing that markets us, and it qualifies who we spend the hours on.
The offer ladder value ladder
Every conversation and every piece of content points at the next rung. This is the company ladder, the one to use.
| Rung | Time-box | What it is |
|---|---|---|
| Build Review | Free · 45 min | The inbound front door. A genuine read on one idea: buildable or not, where it breaks, how we would start. The Dottie and Spark demo lives here, visual proof of the thinking. |
| Discover | 6 weeks | An embedded entrepreneur uncovers and validates the opportunity worth backing, with the business case. The paid first engagement, and the Build Review's natural next step. On an infrastructure asset, this is the second-use diagnosis. |
| Thrive | 12 weeks | Build the business, with evidence at every gate. Iterative and entrepreneurial, not a slow feasibility study. |
| E! Centre | 24 months + | The standing capability, embedded inside the organisation. The flagship engagement; Santos RIC is the proof of concept. |
The five rules that make the front door an engine GTM
Borrowed from the best direct-response playbooks and tuned for an enterprise buyer. These are the company's own rules, and they are why the Build Review converts rather than just being a nice freebie.
- Productise the teardown. The Build Review is a repeatable deliverable with a fixed output, the same shape every time, so it scales and the buyer always leaves with something.
- The Value Equation. Maximise the dream outcome and the proof it works; minimise the time and effort to get it. Detail below.
- Risk reversal. The promise carries the risk: you leave with something worth more than the time, or we say so first. No downside to saying yes.
- Name it specifically. Not "a free consultation." The Build Review, for a named buyer, with a named outcome. Specific reads as confident, and converts.
- Give till they ask. Front-load so much usable value that working with us becomes the obvious next step.
Loading the offer with value
Underneath every offer that feels like a no-brainer sits one equation. Learn it, and you can build offers on purpose instead of by accident.
÷
Time Delay × Effort & Sacrifice
Two things lift the value: a bigger dream and more belief it will happen. Two things crush it: how long it takes and how much it costs them in effort. Everyone competes on the top, the bigger promise. The real edge is the bottom, and in our world the bottom is not price, it is time, risk, and internal politics. Cut those to near zero and we make offers nobody else can touch. Here is how we load each lever:
- Raise the outcome. "A build that pays for itself more than once." Quantify with their own numbers (MEDDIC Metrics, SPIN Implication). Outcome
- Raise their belief. Proof, then the pilot itself is the proof. Authority Social proof
- Cut the time. "Weeks, not the 24-month feasibility study. Hours, not days." This is our sharpest contrast with the incumbent way; hammer it.
- Cut the effort and risk. "Hands off your poles and wires. No IT integration, just a report. We do not tell you how to run your core." Make do-no-harm the headline.
Small money. Big prize. Fast. Nothing to lose, because we never touch the base business. If a careful, time-poor GM hears the first offer and does not quietly think "why wouldn't I", it is not sharp enough yet. Keep raising the prize and cutting the risk until the answer is obvious.
Risk reversal an asset GM respects
- The paid pilot replaces any money-back gimmick. The size of the prize versus the size of the pilot is the real maths.
- Do no harm, in writing. "Nothing we do touches your base business or your regulated returns."
- Speed as a guarantee. "If we cannot show you three costed opportunities in X weeks, you owe us nothing." Real, specific, and it weaponises our actual advantage.
- Success-linked upside where it fits. Carrying risk alongside them is credibility money cannot buy.
It is already named
The free front door is the Build Review; the paid first engagement is Discover. Use those names, not invented ones. The job in an infrastructure conversation is to make clear what Discover produces here: three costed, ranked second-use opportunities on one asset, hands off the base operation. The product is named, we just point it at their world.
Pricing the engagements
We have not locked the numbers yet, so this is the pricing logic, not a rate card. Set the actual bands with leadership before quoting, then hold them so the team quotes with one voice. The principles matter more than the figures.
- Price against the prize, not the hours. On a $100m and up asset, the Discover fee should look trivial next to the value it can surface. State the prize first, then name the price, so the number lands as small.
- Fixed fee, never hourly. Hourly billing caps our value at our time and invites scope-policing. A fixed fee for a defined deliverable keeps everyone focused on the outcome.
- Do not discount to win, reduce scope instead. Cutting price signals low confidence to a GM. If budget is tight, narrow the number of assets, not the rate.
- Not too cheap. Priced too low, a serious buyer reads "not serious." The number must carry enough weight to be respected, while staying tiny against the prize.
- Use success-linked terms where you can. Where value is measurable, tie part of the fee to value identified or unlocked. Carrying risk alongside them is credibility money cannot buy.
| Tier (placeholder, confirm) | Scope | When to use |
|---|---|---|
| Discover, single asset | Three costed, ranked second-use opportunities on one asset, desktop only. | The default first paid yes after the Build Review. |
| Multi-asset or precinct | The same across a portfolio or precinct, including who-connects-to-whom. | When several assets or players are in play (the Middle Arm pattern). |
| Success-linked | A reduced fixed fee plus a share of value identified or unlocked. | When the prize is measurable and the buyer wants us to carry risk with them. |
Dollar figures left deliberately blank. Set the bands with leadership, then keep them consistent across the team.
This is a diagnostic sale, not a services pitch. The offer is the prescription that emerges once the diagnosis is agreed, never the thing you lead with. Give the value first (the Build Review), earn agreement on the problem, and the paid ladder follows. An offer pushed before the diagnosis is accepted is just a pitch, and a pitch into an unaccepted problem loses.
The one-liner and the pitch Hook, Story, Offer
Tim Sherry, the ICN Northern Territory manager from call 02, told us exactly what the market needs: "we want to know straight away, hands on the shovel or consultant." Here is the answer, structured as Hook, Story, Offer, at three lengths. Memorise the first. Everyone should say it the same way.
"We find the money hiding inside infrastructure that everyone else sees only as cost. Not consultants, not engineers: we make a build pay for itself more than once."
It answers the lane question in the first clause (Take control). It leads with the outcome and one vivid story, not the mechanism (Hook, Story). It front-loads proof (Authority). And it ends with a question, so you stop presenting and start a conversation (hand the floor back).
The next move: show, do not tell
"Can I show you three of those on your network?" is not a rhetorical flourish. It is the handover into a demo of Dottie and Spark, and the demo is where abstract value becomes visible. Government buyers are happy with frameworks and process; private-company buyers want to see it. The demo is how we give them that, and it doubles as live proof that we can actually do the thinking we claim.
The idea map
Captures and connects ideas and grounds them on their infrastructure. On screen, the adjacencies stop being a story and become a picture: this asset, these connected opportunities, here is where the value hides. the reframe, made visual
Options and pathways
Positions, sequences and decides between the bets: which to do first, what unlocks what, where the money and risk sit. This is the "should I do this one or this one first" question answered visually. Metrics, Decision criteria
It is fast, it is concrete, and it is undeniable. A five-minute walk-through on something close to their world does more for perceived likelihood, the belief that we can actually deliver, than any amount of talking. Treat the demo as the bridge from the pitch to the paid pilot: show the visual, then say "this is the free version on a generic asset, the pilot does it properly on yours." Lead the demo with one of their own examples, never a generic one.
The discovery question bank SPIN
Organised by SPIN stage. The goal is to talk less than the buyer until you have the full picture. Print this; take it into calls.
Situation, orient quickly
- "Before I tell you about us, what made you take this call? What did you hear?"
- "Walk me through how this asset is set up and who owns what today."
- "Who else cares about this internally, and what do they each need to see?" finds the economic buyer
Problem, find the accepted cost
- "Where is value leaking that everyone has accepted as just the cost of doing business?"
- "What is sitting on your books that you have to maintain but cannot use, or cannot remove?"
- "What is the item that everyone agrees should happen but nobody has time to own?" the DMIS pattern
Implication, make it hurt (spend most time here)
- "Over the full regulatory horizon, what does that maintenance actually total?"
- "When that decision lands without this thought-through, what does it cost you to unwind later?"
- "If a neighbour builds the same infrastructure you could have shared, what was the price of not asking?"
Need-payoff, let them voice the value
- "If that asset paid for itself instead of just costing you, what would that change?"
- "Who would that make a hero internally?"
- "What would it be worth to have this de-risked before the board sees it?"
Surface the real friction, the denominator
- "What would have to be true for your risk and legal people to be comfortable?"
- "What is the smallest version of this we could prove without going near your base operation?"
- "Is there a deadline that makes this matter now rather than next year?" find the real clock
Objection handling
Every one of these came up, or nearly came up, in the three calls. Each response is built to reduce risk, not to push. Click to open. Tags show which principle is doing the work.
Said almost verbatim by Tim. The worst response is to concede the struggle. The best answers the lane question and hands over one picture. Take control
The exact dynamic that strands the $2m DMIS scheme: too small for the person juggling a $1.3bn project. Turn small into the feature. Commitment
We diagnosed this ourselves: on the eastern seaboard "everyone says yeah we do that, but they don't." Do not argue. Test it gently with a specific. Implication question
Brad raised exactly this. GP's live answer was strong; here it is sharpened.
The real, recurring fear in regulated infrastructure. Pre-empt it and make do-no-harm the headline. Risk reversal
Chris flagged this as a live constraint and an edge for us. Flip it from a barrier into the advantage.
Brad's instinctive first question. In high-stakes sales this is the gate. Answer it before it is asked. Authority Social proof
Chris's exact warning about how the regulated side thinks. Do not pitch efficiency; pitch unregulated upside and reputation.
Both ICN managers said this clearly. Honour the protocol and make their job easy, do not push past them. Reciprocity
The polite stall that ends most early calls. Convert warmth into a dated, owned next step before you hang up. Reinforce
The gatekeeper and referral playbook
This is our superpower, so treat it like an asset, not a happy accident. Our buyers rely on peer recommendations and do not attend conferences or read journals. The warm intro is the primary channel, and two of these three calls exist only to feed it.
The five rules of running champions Reciprocity Social proof
- Make them look good, every time. Their reputation is the currency they are lending you. Never make an intro regret it. Do-no-harm matters to the gatekeeper too.
- Always close the loop. We did this well with Tim. Report back on every intro, win or lose. It is the single biggest driver of the next ten.
- Hand them a champion kit. Brad offered to write our "skinny" for us. Never make a gatekeeper invent your words. Give them a forwardable paragraph, a one-liner, and one example.
- Ask for names, not categories. "Who specifically should we talk to, and would you introduce us?" beats "do you know anyone." We did this with Tim and it worked.
- Give before you ask. Share intel, make an intro back, send the link first. Reciprocity is the whole engine.
The champion kit, hand this to every gatekeeper
What to offer the gatekeeper in return
- Make their network look active. Every good intro that lands is a win they can report. Say it: "every intro that works is a story you can tell your board."
- Bring them deals, do not just take them. When you meet someone who needs ICN, send them back. Affiliates who receive, give more.
- Feed them intelligence. You see things across states they cannot. Share it, and you become the most valuable name in their contacts.
First-touch outreach: getting the meeting
The champion kit is for when a gatekeeper forwards us. These are for when we reach out ourselves. Keep them short, lead with proof and one specific, relevant hook, and ask for one small thing: a short conversation. Long messages get skimmed; specific ones get answered.
1. The warm-intro follow-up Reciprocity Social proof
Highest-priority channel, since our buyers act on peer recommendation. Send within a day of the intro.
2. The cold email to an asset owner Hook, Story, Offer Authority
Use a real trigger: an announced project, a regulatory decision, a decommissioning. No trigger, no send.
3. The LinkedIn note Liking
Shorter again. The goal is a reply, not a sale. Connect first with a one-line reason, then this once accepted.
One specific hook tied to them, one piece of proof, one small ask. If you would not read it in ten seconds, cut it. And every send needs a reason it is landing now: a trigger, an intro, a clock. Generic outreach to this audience is wasted.
Three calls, coached
Each call is read for what it was for, scored on the six things that decide an early high-stakes conversation, and coached: what is working, where to sharpen, the exact rewrite, and notes for Jason and GP. The scores are a profile to track over time, not a report card. Be honest with them; the point is to watch them climb.
Each call is rated against the six behaviours that decide an early high-stakes conversation, the same six on the post-call scorecard in Section 16, where what "good" looks like for each is spelled out. Every rating is an evidence-based coaching read from the call, not a precise metric: the aim is to see the shape, strengths versus growth areas, and watch it move over time. The three bands:
- Growth area (around 3 to 4 out of 10). The clearest thing to fix next; it cost this call something.
- Solid (around 6 to 7). Reliably good, no real concern.
- Strong (around 8 to 9). A genuine strength to bank and repeat.
You refused to build slides before agreeing the target, and you found a brilliant beachhead in the $2m DMIS scheme. The single opportunity: the explanation of what we do ran ahead of the listener, so the room asked for examples. With a paid champion, the prize is making him able to sell us in confidently, and that needs the simple version.
What's working, bank it
- Refusing to pitch prematurely. "before we build slides, PowerPoint, whatever, because we want to be on the same page about what's the purpose, what's the point? Who are we talking to?" Mature, and rare.
- Finding the beachhead. Spotting the $2m scheme as "a really tight one, that's good scope" to "go target as our first engagement" is exactly the bottom rung of the value ladder.
- Naming the land-and-expand logic: "small engagements that demonstrate capability, that lead to larger ones that are then the true unlock of the exercise." Commitment
- Reading the buyer through Chris. Mapping which executives are gettable and who tests you is real MEDDIC decision-process work.
Where to sharpen
- Lead with the example, then the concept. The "fundamental unlock" and "capital allocation process" framing arrived before any picture, and the room asked for examples in response.
- Shift the talk-listen ratio. The concrete gold (the $40m line removal, the DMIS scheme) came from Chris. Bank those as your own opening examples so you lead with them next time. ask, don't tell
- Put the prize in dollars yourself. Chris handed us "$40 million to remove those lines" and a "$1.3 billion project." Anchor our value to one of those numbers. Metrics
- Nail the commission terms. "the deal would be commission on all of these" is worth making explicit early with a paid champion.
Lead with the outcome and one vivid picture, then earn the abstraction. This hands Chris a story he can repeat to Klaus word for word.
You are the domain heavyweight, which is exactly why it is easy to over-trust the room's appetite for the concept. One discipline: a concrete example before any abstraction, every time. Cap opening answers near sixty seconds, then ask "does that land, or want the longer version?" Let them pull the detail from you.
Coaching · GPYou were quiet here, and this is a call where your gift matters most. In a channel conversation you are the translator: when the concept gets ahead of the room, step in with the example and the dollar figure. And own the exit: "So the first engagement is the DMIS play, you are getting us fifteen minutes with the owner, we come back next week with a one-page scope." That crisp close was there to be taken.
The shade-plant-under-solar example is exactly how we should always explain ourselves, and Tim started co-creating with you. The one thing to change: we told a referral partner we struggle to explain ourselves, and he confirmed the website left him confused. Excellent relationship work, with a clarity gap to tidy.
What's working, bank it
- Closing the loop and thanking him properly. Treating a champion well is how you earn the next ten intros. Textbook. Reciprocity
- The shade-plant example. "Where are shady conditions in the territory underneath solar panels?" Concrete, surprising, instantly repeatable. This is the gold standard for explaining adjacency.
- The Middle Arm example made Tim co-create: "Can they share the same pipeline for cooling down their towers?" When the buyer builds your pitch with you, you have landed it. Reframe
- The differentiation probe. "Come across anybody like us in the territory?" Smart. It surfaced that ICN NT has no one doing this, a positioning gift.
- Asking for specific intros and getting them (DLI, procurement names, Darwin Port). Champion
Where to sharpen
- The website is leaking. "I tried to do computer research on you guys... I was a little confused." Worth a same-week fix to the top-of-funnel asset.
- Reframe the broad-offer reflex. "It's always a conundrum and a problem we're struggling with" is honest, but to a partner it reads as doubt. Say "we are deliberately broad, here is how to point us" instead.
- Take the fix Tim handed you. "We want to know straight away: hands on the shovel, or consultant?" Use that exact lane answer in the first sentence.
- Offer value back to ICN itself. Give him a reason to look good, not just goodwill to lean on. Reciprocity
Never air the internal struggle to a referral source. Answer the lane question in his words, then expand. Confidence is contagious; so is doubt.
This was your best example work of the three calls. Bottle it: the shade-plant story is now a permanent arrow in your quiver. One add: when you have just nailed an example and the partner is leaning in, that is the moment to convert to a dated next step, not another concept. Strike while they are nodding. Reinforce
Coaching · GPYou manage relationships beautifully and the gratitude was real. The one reflex to retrain: you voiced the "we struggle to explain ourselves" line. Same truth, opposite effect, framed as "we are deliberately broad, so here is how to point us." That keeps his confidence to refer us high.
Brad gave you a goldmine of project intelligence and you let him, which is good discovery discipline. The "count us out too early" reframe was clean objection handling. Two things to sharpen: open with proof and a picture rather than what we are not, and keep to one domain example so the close stays tight.
What's working, bank it
- Rewarding him for reading the docs. "It's always a concern if we send things to people when they don't read them... I really appreciate you doing that." Warm, disarming, generous. Liking
- Letting the expert talk. Brad delivered stages, timelines, budgets and named contacts. High-value discovery, and you did not step on it. listen
- The "too late" save. "We've had some success with projects that are beginning construction... I don't want to say count us out too early." Clean, confident, true.
- Respecting the gatekeeper protocol and naming Lisa, Bettina and Dasco as social proof across the network. Social proof
- Asking the differentiation and referral questions and walking away with Origin, Energy Co and Essential Energy.
Where to sharpen
- Open with what we are, not what we are not. "We don't fit in your typical engineering box" tells Brad the category we are outside. Lead with proof and a picture instead.
- Front-load proof. Brad's first real reaction was "how long have you been an entity?" The Santos embed should arrive in the first three sentences, not the last. Authority
- One domain example per call. Animal hides on reefs, then nanotech wine into satellites, reopened the confusion you had just closed. Bank the hides story for the agribusiness-specific conversation.
- Hand over the champion kit. Brad offered to "put a skinny together." Give him the exact paragraph to forward.
Proof, then category, then one picture, then a question that hands the floor back. Brad asked how long we had existed because we made him wonder. Answer it before he has to ask.
Two habits to swap. Open with what we are, not what we are not. And the Santos embed is our single strongest credibility asset; it arrived late and almost in passing. Move it to your first three sentences with any new gatekeeper. Authority
Coaching · GPThe "count us out too early" reframe was the best single line across all three calls. That calm objection handling is your gift. The one thing to manage is the domain tangent that scattered the close: one example per call, bank the rest, and finish by handing Brad the forwardable paragraph he literally offered to write himself.
Discovery and champion leverage are consistently strong; the team is good with people. Clarity of offer is consistently the area to grow, and proof tends to arrive later than it should. Fix those two, lead with proof and one example, and these strong calls become exceptional ones without anyone learning a new skill.
Drills and role-play
Clarity and discovery are muscles, not memos. They are built with reps. Five quick drills, then four role-play scenarios a sales lead can run live.
The seven-second test
Each person says the one-liner cold, no notes, in seven seconds. If it wanders, you are not ready. Repeat until it is identical every time.
Example-first reps
Open any capability with a concrete, dollar-anchored example before any concept. Banned words for the drill: ecosystem, unlock, adjacency, optimise. Earn them back.
Implication laddering
Take any accepted cost and ask five Implication questions in a row, each making it hurt more. Trains the SPIN habit that separates top performers.
Objection ping-pong
One fires an objection from Section 11, the other answers in under fifteen seconds. Rotate all ten. Weekly, until the responses are reflexes.
Score the tape
After every real call, both fill the scorecard independently, then compare. Use Winston's talk-time and question metrics to settle the discovery score with data, not memory. The gaps between your two scores are where the real coaching is.
Talk less
In complex sales the person asking the best questions wins, not the one explaining the most. Aim to talk less than the buyer until you have the full picture.
Role-play scenarios
"I looked at your site and I was a bit confused."
Setup: rep is on with an ICN-style manager who is friendly but unclear what we do. Lead plays the gatekeeper.
"How long have you even been around?"
Setup: a GM is interested but quietly testing whether we are real. Lead plays a slightly sceptical executive.
"We already optimise our projects."
Setup: rep must teach the Challenger insight without arguing. Lead plays a confident asset owner.
"Sounds interesting, send me something."
Setup: warm call winding down without a next step. Lead plays a friendly but busy buyer.
Per-rep notes
JasonRole: the subject matter expert. Deep domain credibility and real operator stories. You are the living proof that we have actually run these assets, which makes you our authority and our unity with the buyer in one person. Carry the war stories; that is your job in the room.
Bank it: when you go concrete (the shade plant, the dead-steel reuse) you are genuinely compelling and nobody can question whether you have lived it.
Sharpen: your expertise is the trap, it is easy to over-estimate the room's appetite for the concept and to run long. Two rules: one example before any concept, and a sixty-second cap on opening answers before handing back a question. Then let GP land the commercial point.
GPRole: the one who ties it together commercially. You own cutting in with the picture and the dollar figure the moment a conversation drifts abstract, and you own locking the dated next step at the end of every meeting. When Jason supplies the depth, you convert it into a number and a commitment. You are the velocity in the room.
Bank it: warmth, relationship management, and the calmest objection handling of the three calls. The "count us out too early" reframe was the best single line in the set.
Sharpen: reframe the broad-offer reflex from a struggle into a deliberate strength, and hold the team to one domain example per call so the close stays tight.
The roles only pay off if they map to the call (see the timeline in Section 16). GP leads the bookends: open, frame, discovery, then sell, handle concerns, and lock the next step. Jason leads the middle: the proof, the teach, the SME depth and the demo. GP runs the questions and reads the room; Jason supplies the depth on cue, then hands back. One handoff to rehearse: when a number is needed, Jason supplies it (he holds the asset economics) and GP frames it as the commercial point and ties it to the ask. Do not make GP invent figures he does not have. Worth noting: giving GP the close directly counters his one habit to watch, the warm-but-soft ending, so the role and the development goal are the same thing.
Run a 60-minute coaching session
A ready-to-run agenda for a sales lead. Repeatable weekly or fortnightly. No prep beyond picking one real call to review.
- Warm up, 5 min. Each person says the one-liner cold (Drill 01). Note who wandered. This alone tells you where clarity sits this week.
- Review one real call, 15 min. Pull up a recent recording or notes. Score it together on the six dimensions (Section 16). Lead asks: what is working, where would we sharpen, before giving an opinion.
- Teach one layer, 10 min. Pick a single layer of the method that the call exposed (often SPIN Implication or front-loading proof). Walk the relevant section. Do not try to cover all six.
- Role-play, 20 min. Run one scenario from Section 14 that matches the gap. Rotate who plays the buyer. Stop and reset whenever the rep reverts to old habits; reps over realism.
- Objection ping-pong, 5 min. Fire five objections from Section 11. Under fifteen seconds each. Keep it fast and a little fun.
- Commit, 5 min. Each person names one specific behaviour to change on their next real call, and which dimension they expect to move. Write it down. Check it next session.
Coach the behaviour, praise it specifically, and let people find the answer before you give it. The scores exist to show progress over weeks, not to rank people in a room. The teardowns in this guide are written the way a session should feel: honest about the gap, generous about the person.
Run the call, then score it
Section 02 lays out the anatomy of a call: the eight phases and which layer leads in each. This is the coaching companion to that map: the step-by-step to run a first conversation, and the scorecard to grade it afterwards. Same eight phases, now turned into habits.
The shape of a first call
- Frame and clarify, first 5 min. "Here is what I hope we get to, and I want to understand your world first." Ask why they took the call. Do not pitch yet. Clarify
- Proof in one breath. Since 2018, embedded in Santos, champions in three states. Pay the credibility toll early. Authority
- One-liner plus one picture. Lane answer, then a single vivid example, then stop and ask "does that land?" Hook, Story
- Discovery, the longest part. Work the SPIN bank. Quantify the prize. Listen more than you talk. SPIN
- Teach the reframe. Lead them to see the cost of the status quo before positioning us. Challenger
- Show visual value. Walk them through Dottie and Spark on something close to their world. Private buyers want to see it, not hear about it, and the demo is live proof of capability. Visual value
- Sell the outcome and name the first engagement. Reflect their own numbers back as the prize. Offer
- Handle the concern actually present (Section 11), then lock the dated, owned next step. Hand over the champion kit if it is a gatekeeper. Reinforce
The post-call scorecard
Score every real call out of 10 on each. Anything under 6 is the coaching focus for the next one. Track the profile over weeks; you are watching it climb.
The field card
The whole guide on a single card. Pin it next to the phone.
Lock the one-liner and the sixty-second pitch, drill them until everyone says them identically, and put proof in the first three sentences of every new conversation. That single change moves clarity, the lowest score on every call, and clarity moves everything else.